Mustafa Ege Sik vs Jacob Cairncross Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Sep at 03:47 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Ege Sik vs J. Cairncross

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sik 1 - 0 Cairncross
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mustafa Ege Sik winning 2 and Jacob Cairncross winning 0. The last match between Mustafa Ege Sik and Jacob Cairncross was at the M25 Tamworth, 09-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Mustafa Ege Sik getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sik | 1 |
| Cairncross | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Tamworth(09-09-25)
M. E. Sik vs J. Cairncross H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.22% (15-8) | Career Total W/L | 66.67% (4-2) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. E. Sik vs J. Cairncross Match Preview:
- How do the players perform on their second serve? Cairncross has secured 0% of points, whereas Sik has a higher success rate with 47.14%. Sik appears to excel in this area.
- Concerning returns, Sik capitalizes on both the opponent's second serve at 37.69% and their first serve at 22.12%, while Cairncross has not won any points in these scenarios. This suggests Sik's advantage in returning serves.
- Under pressure, Cairncross has struggled, saving 0% of breakpoints, compared to Sik's 64.44% save rate, indicating stronger mental fortitude from Sik during critical moments.
- If we look at their past performance, Cairncross boasts a perfect record over the past year but with only two matches (2/0), while Sik has a sturdier record with 8 wins out of 12 matches (66.67%). Sik shows more consistency with more matches played.
- Cairncross has primarily excelled on Hard courts, winning 100% of matches, yet Sik has a higher win percentage on Grass, 75%, than on Hard.
- Both players have competed mainly in lower-tier tournaments; however, Sik has faced more competitive opponents with an average rank of 183.67 compared to Cairncross's substantially lower-ranked opponents.
- What about their performance in deciding sets? Cairncross has triumphed in 100% of such instances, while Sik has succeeded in 75% of their matches involving a deciding set, giving Cairncross the edge if the match goes the distance.
- Sik has a better breakpoint conversion rate at 30.77% compared to Cairncross's 0%, crucial for impactful moments in a match.
Editorial Prediction (September 8, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming clash presents Sik as a formidable opponent, especially in areas that heavily influence match outcomes, such as second serves, return games, and under pressure situations. Sik’s consistency in both break point conversion and match play against higher-ranked opponents further underscore their competency on the court.
Although Cairncross shines in deciding set scenarios and has a spotless, albeit limited, record, Sik's more rigorous competition level and superior service return performance suggest a stronger likelihood of prevailing.
Based on these patterns and comparative analyses, Sik is positioned as the probable winner of this tennis encounter.
Mustafa Ege Sik vs Jacob Cairncross Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. E. Sik vs J. Cairncross H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:35:8 | Average Match Time | 1:35:8 |
| 65% (51/79) | 1st Serve % | 44% (24/55) |
| 63% (32/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (16/24) |
| 46% (13/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
| 49% (27/55) | Return Points Win % | 43% (34/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. E. Sik Recent Matches Played
J. Cairncross Recent Matches Played

M. E. Sik vs J. Cairncross Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.22% (15/8) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 61.11% (33/21) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.54% (8/5) |
| 52.11% (309/284) | Games Win/Loss | 55.83% (67/53) |
| 60.00% (9/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 75.00% (6/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 62 | Aces Total | 1 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 76 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:11:58 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 247.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 146.33 |
| 60% (706/1170) | 1st Serve % | 54% (59/110) |
| 66% (469/706) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (36/59) |
| 49% (226/464) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (18/51) |
| 42% (36/86) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 38% (375/992) | Return Points Win % | 37% (47/126) |
| 65.22% (15/8) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 65% (15/23) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 77% (10/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 63% (5/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 86% (14/12) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
| 14% (14/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (4/0) |
| 33% (9/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |